Berkeley Puppet Interview Manual Transmission

Bracken Helmes: What attracted you to Porsche initially?Pete Stout: The first car that made me realize Porsche was special actually wasn’t a Porsche. It was a toy. My childhood best friend and I would play with Hot Wheels every day after school, and he had a silver 930—a Tomy Pocket Car.

We shared every car except that one.The actual car that brought me into Porsche was my brother’s 914. My family bought it when he was in high school for $3,000.

It was pretty faded—it was an honest car with solid bones, but it was tired and it had been driven a lot in its life. In hindsight, it was a good one, but at the time it just seemed like another used 914. When he left for college, he left it behind and I got stuck with it. I didn’t even want it at the time—I wanted to hot-rod our old Rabbit.

Masking Tools. 3d photo software. Shrink Wrap Tool. Interactive Threshold. Import External MasksTexturing FeaturesFoto 3D creates a photo-realistic UV texture for your model.

Korea, an engineer at the axle and manual transmission maker Dymos replied, “China is already a threat.” (Author interview, Kim Yong-Kee, General Manager, P/T Advanced R&D Department, Dymos, Inc., Hwaseung-si, July 1, 2008). Tens of billions of dollars of foreign investment from. Berkeley Puppet Interview (BPI)Since the first publication of psychometric data in 1998 (Measelle, Ablow, Cowan, & Cowan, 1998, Child Development ), the.

I was more interested in GTIs than 914s, but then the Rabbit blew up. I’m now glad that it did, because the 914 taught me what good steering feels like.

It taught me what balance is. It taught me about minimalist design, and it taught me about momentum. BH: What do you like about working with Porsche?PS: I got into the work for the cars, but while I enjoy the cars immensely, as time has gone on what fascinates me with this vocation is the type of people these cars draw: the designers, engineers, and creative thinkers. Porsches have a fundamental honesty to them and a minimalistic approach—the form follows the function and that draws a certain kind of person. As does the evolution of the cars, what with the consistent refinements over time. The conversations and relationships that have happened over the years are probably the most enjoyable and rewarding thing about it all though.BH: What kind of work did you do before you got involved with Porsches?PS: I worked on a shipping dock at Costco.BH: How long have you been in the journalism and editing business?PS: I wrote my first article for Excellence in 1993 as part of the curriculum for a journalism class in college. It was published in 1994.BH: Why did you choose to write about cars?PS: When I was in school, a guy named Wentley Phipps came to speak to the students.

He was a gospel singer from the South and an incredible orator. He spoke about dreams that day, and you could hear a pin drop in the gymnasium. He just overwhelmed every student, and got me thinking, ‘What are my dreams?’ ‘What am I interested in?’ ‘What am I made to do?’A lot of things were on my mind at that time; about the future, what it should be, and what is valuable. I had put cars out of my life so I could concentrate on college at the time because I was not a great student up to that point. I also had some social questions about the validity of cars. I struggled with that for a little bit, I was very idealistic.

It was about this time that this quiet thought came to me: ‘If you wrote about cars, you could drive everything you ever wanted to and never have to own any of them.’ That became intriguing to me. BH: How has what you’re involved with changed or evolved?PS: I came into magazine publishing alongside the rise of the internet. The internet has absolutely changed what print media is.

In 1997 I was hired full time at Excellence, and soon started watching all of my friends get hired by dot coms, and I thought ‘Oh boy, I have to get off this dying horse.’ Then a couple years later, I saw a lot of those same friends get pink slips and thought, ‘Maybe it is okay to stay here for a little bit.’ In the end, I was really fortunate to be sheltered from the whole print disaster—because Porsche was such a strong subject, Excellence did just fine. It was a good place to be as I saw the internet unfold. In those days, people—myself included—were saying,‘Print is done and it will all be digital.’ As we have seen though, that is not the case. New media isn’t new anymore.

It’s 20 years old now, and it has matured. There are wonderful things out there, such as Rennlist, Petrolicious, Instagram, and many more. The way people interact with media has changed, but I do not see the digital medium as a replacement for print; there are still people who want to hold things in their hands.

We are seeing younger people defy the idea that real things are dead on a broader scale too; they are going out and buying vinyl records and film cameras.I was fearful of digital media when I was younger, but as time has gone on I’ve come to realize it’s just another tool. I can never fully convey the sound of a car on paper. I can describe it as best I can, but words cannot touch video when it comes to conveying the emotion of its sound.

There are, however, other aspects where a website isn’t a good delivery device—such as length of time before you tune out (this interview may be a great example!). When I get into a good book I can be tuned in for hours.

It feels like a real escape.So the internet is not a replacement for print in my opinion. I welcome new channels because they create a broader toolset, a fuller picture, and new opportunities.

That’s what 000 is doing: it’s a response to how media has changed. I look at 000 as an “and,” not an “or.” The print world was fearful that the internet was going to be an “or,” but it’s become an “and.”BH: What do you think of these new mediums altogether?PS: I feel like it is becoming overwhelming. There are so many outlets now that it becomes a bit of an overload for us as humans. I don’t think our brains were meant to work with so many inputs. Facebook, LinkedIn, private messages, email, texts, phone calls, voicemails, forums, faxes, etc.

I don’t think that is how we were made to fundamentally think. So, a lot really has changed in the last 20 years. I think that has an effect on media. We get saturated.Print remains the escape it always was though. Print means turning everything off; there is no hotlink that takes you somewhere else.

If print is done well, it absorbs you, and you become immersed in it. BH: With that said, w hat would you say 000 is about?PS: We wanted to do an art criticism piece where Porsche just happens to be its subject, and I think Porsche is a worthy one.

That is what 000 is. It’s intended to be an escape from the barrage of time-sensitive media.

It’s something that comes four times a year instead of six or twelve, or every day, every hour. It won’t be for everyone. It’s expensive, because it’s expensive to produce, but there is something else you spend when you consume media: w hen I’m on Instagram for example, I’m allotting those minutes to Instagram when I could be using them for something else. There is also the cell phone bill at the end of the month and the cost of the device. People don’t think about all of these things that are built into the dollar cost. And again, there’s always that one cost that’s difficult to measure: time.

Our time is the one thing we can’t go earn more of. But, we can spend it well. BH: What’s the most exciting car you’ve had the chance to spend time with?PS: There have been so many, but there are two standouts. One was the Carrera GT.

I had it for a week, and spent 1,200 miles in it in all conditions. The best single road drive I have ever had came in that car on the roads in the far north of California. Every movement inside the car was measured, slow, but everything outside the car was moving so fast. It was like being in a vortex, as if there was a storm all around the car. The redwoods blurred, but inside there were all these simple, small movements.

I think anybody could have been in the car and been comfortable. I believe some call it flow, and it can happen in any discipline: to a woodworker, or a basketball player, or a surfer. If someone is good at something—or just okay at it and having a good day—there is a certain space that can be occupied, and that car got me into that space better than any other.The paradox is that the Carrera GT is one of the hardest cars to drive well, because there is a big intimidation factor involved. It took me 200 or 300 miles before that wore off, and I am in the business of getting over a car’s intimidation factor relatively quickly! The handling was not sorted in the way some other Porsches are sorted—especially in the years since.

There is more than 600 horsepower coming from an engine that revs up like a light switch, a pretty rudimentary traction control system, and, most importantly, tire technology that just wasn’t there yet. After 300 miles though, I started to gel with the car. At 700 miles, when the aforementioned part of the drive happened, came perfect roads at a perfect time of day in a desolate place.

Among incredible redwoods and a nice climb away from the ocean on perfect pavement, it was surreal! The real shocker was the user friendliness of the Yellow Bird. If you watch RUF’s “Faszination” video, it looks like only Stefan Roser need apply for the driver’s seat—like you’d better be ready to sort the steering out at 130mph.

I had a friend in a follow car on a rainy day way up in Northern California, and I told him to go ahead because he had a Subaru WRX STi with all-wheel drive and ABS. I was going to drive like a grandma because the CTR is priceless, essentially. He said, ‘No, I want to stay behind you.’ And lo and behold, driven conservatively, the Yellow Bird was quicker down that road than my friend—who is a decent driver—in an STi with all the inherent advantages like all-wheel drive, ABS, and R-compound tires. When something works, it works, and that makes for a magical car. Counterintuitively, the Yellow Bird is no mere record car: it is actually a great driver’s car.

Despite having far too much power for its tires, old-tech suspension, and being set up for straight-line speed.So, those two cars are the most exciting I’ve tested—even better than some of the race cars, though of course that’s always a treat in its own right. BH: You mentioned the “low-tech” suspension, so I have to ask: a ir-cooled or water-cooled?PS: Like with media, this is not an “or” for me, it’s an “and.” The most fun I have had in Porsche ownership has been the times when I had one that was air-cooled and one that was water-cooled. The first time that happened was with my 914 and my first Boxster; each made me enjoy parts of the other one more, and they also exhibited the downsides of each. I really appreciated each one more due to the presence of the other.Right now, I have an air-cooled and a water-cooled, and to me that is the way to do Porsche. If you can only have one it gets trickier.

I would rather have two cars that are “lesser” Porsches—one from the old days and one from the newer days. I’d rather have a 914-4 and a base Boxster of whichever year than have one more-expensive Porsche.

That is just me, personally, and the way I choose to experience Porsche. There is excellence in both eras. BH: What do you like about the air-cooled era?PS: I like that it became so contrarian, that Porsche persisted with air/oil-cooling in the face of regulations and emissions and everything else, all the way up to 1998. I like that that was their technology and they stuck with it.

It shows perseverance.BH: And to fill in the other half: w hat do you like about the water-cooled motors?PS: Better efficiency, lower emissions, less sound pollution. These are things we car people don’t often talk about, but we should. I hear about people taking the catalysts off their modern Porsches and it saddens me. They are doing it to gain zero to five horsepower—if they’re lucky—on a basis of 400 or 500! What is the cost to the environment? Come on, I have a daughter.

If we really love cars, we have a responsibility to lead by example. Our hobby inherently isn’t great on our environment—let’s be clear on that. We don’t need to make it worse. A modern car with catalysts is a wonderful thing.

It has increased the air quality in the Bay Area significantly. My father says that when he used to look out the window in his office at the Lawrence Berkeley Lab during the late 1960s and early 1970s, he could not see across the bay. And now it is very rare that you cannot see across on any given day. Water-cooling has bridged us from air-cooling to where we are going with electric mobility.

I spent a thousand miles in the real world with the 918 Spyder recently, and you know what? The 918 works really well around San Francisco when you are stuck in traffic, uphill, spending 90 minutes to go 16 blocks. If I was in the Carrera GT, I would have been reaching for a gun—just to end it. In the 918 though, I was making Bluetooth phone calls and might as well have been in an E-Class Benz.

Then, out in the middle of nowhere, on the North Coast, I turned off the V8 and just ran the electric motors—the 918 was a blast that way too.Water-cooling has allowed Porsche to continue, and that is the best thing about it in my mind. BH: What are your thoughts on the whole PDK vs. Manual debate?PS: Manual, all day long. I like PDK on the race track if I just want to go fast. I understand why some people need PDK though, and I can see how some people prefer it for traffic. I do like PDK for autocrossing, and when I’m on the autobahn it removes one area of concentration so I can focus elsewhere in extreme driving situations.I actually tried living with PDK for two years: I ordered a Cayman S purposely with PDK to see if I could be converted.

That car sat in the garage a lot. For Saturday morning errands, I would take our pig-nosed, 200-horsepower, four-door GTI with a stick over the 320-horsepower, mid-engined Porsche with PDK. That told me that around town—when you can’t go fast—you can still interact with the machine when it’s a manual. PDK removed that bond, and I missed it. So, for me, I prefer a manual every time. I want the experience. BH: What are the coolest cars you’ve owned, in your opinion?PS: The ’73 914 was my first car, and I still have it.

I had a lot of fun with a 1989 Merkur XR4Ti too. I’ve also owned a 911 SC, a Boxster, a couple of GTIs, an Abarth, and now the GT4.

I had a WRX for a while and enjoyed that a great deal as well—it was my first new car. I am a huge fan of the modern Fiat 500 Abarth.

I may have to buy another one, because I enjoyed it so much. To me, it is in a lot of ways a modern day 356 because it has a similar friendly style: people react to it in a very positive way.

Its size is something I sorely miss in modern cars. I could go into San Francisco for a date with my wife and we could be parked anywhere, or even just at a stoplight, and it always made people smile, which in turn makes you smile. That kind of thing is missing in a lot of today’s sports cars.On the other hand, the GT4 is phenomenal, and i’s an occasion every time I drive it. As is the 914 and other Porsches I have owned, but that goofy little Abarth was just a ball as a daily driver.

It was full of flaws and the car really falls apart at about 7 or 8/10ths, but from 3 to 7/10ths, it’s a total hoot. I dearly wish Porsche would make something in that size. I don’t want them to make a Fiat Abarth necessarily, just a car that size. Size can be its own luxury.

“Small” is missing in too many cars today. BH: Which was your favorite if you had to choose?PS: The 914, because it was where my road to Porsche started. If I had to sell everything, the 914 would be the last to go. It isn’t a better car than the GT4, but it’s a bigger part of my journey. I’ve painted it three times, and have been modifying it off and on since high school. It’s got a small six in it, five-lug suspension, and bigger brakes, but nothing on it looks like something Porsche wouldn’t have done.BH: A friend who is an auto designer really likes 914s—what are your thoughts on the design?PS:I would never say it’s pretty. It’s very hard to find a bad angle on a 356 or an original 911, but I can find bad angles on my 914.

A 914, to me, is not an easy design to work with, but over time I have grown to really like the way the car looks. It is the cleanest, simplest shape you can come up with to house two people, an engine, and four wheels. All four wheels are pushed all the way out to the edges, the engine is in the middle, it has a big interior and two real trunks, and the greenhouse is very small, but offers fantastic visibility in all directions.If we say Porsche is about form following function, the 914 is very hard to argue with.

So I do like the way the car presents itself. I didn’t back in high school—I didn’t even want the car when I was younger. I look at it now though and call it beautiful. It is not pretty, but it’s beautiful. To me, anyway. Time has been very kind to the design, because when it first came out nothing looked like it.

Now we have had the Dodge Viper and the Honda Del Sol and other cars with that basket-handle targa bar. Slab sides were really weird back then but became very common later on. PS: Porsche is smart. They have to manage their model lines. They have to manage their future. There are elements that are capped by the technology they have, the regulations they have to meet, and the price points they’re aiming for.

There’s also an intelligent stewardship of what the evolution is and should be. They have to be thinking about being around for ten or twenty years. It is very easy for an enthusiast to say, ‘Oh, they are holding this car back.’ We all have to remember though that Porsche is a company that has employees that have to put food on the table and one that needs to satisfy shareholders.

So they have to be smart about how they evolve their cars. The 911R and RS, at some level, represent what is possible right now with a naturally-aspirated flat-six—so I am not sure how much Porsche is hampering them. Are they pushing the GT4 as far out there? But are they charging you as much? No.You better believe they are thinking many years down the line.

It’s a really interesting time right now in terms of the GT3 and the R, because how much further can they push the naturally-aspirated flat-six? But then again, I remember thinking that with the 996 GT3 and then the 997 GT3. We kept seeing these impressive bumps in power from what was essentially the same engine: I remember when they went from 380 horsepower in the 996 GT3 to 415 in the 997. I thought, ‘Wow they found 35 horsepower—that is pretty impressive, because at 380 it seemed high strung!’ Then they went up 200 cc, and 400 cc, and got to 500 hp. So it’s not like they haven’t surprised us in the past.BH: Building on that, what are your t houghts on Porsche as a whole today?PS: The Porsche that we all knew 20, 30, or 40 years ago has of course been growing and changing.

Has it changed more now with the addition of the four-doors? Yes, without question. The 356 folks used to say, ‘Real Carreras have four cams.’ They got mad when the Carrera name was used on the newer cars at the time that weren’t four-cam 356s.

And now, my neighbors have Cayennes. Do they have soul in them the way a 356 or 911 does?

Do they have the fingerprints of Porsche? If that brings my neighbors into a conversation we can have about Porsche, how great is that?So I embrace all of this, it doesn’ t bother me. It makes it a challenge for Porsche, for those in the business of Porsche, and for the enthusiast to keep the faith, as the 356 people used to say. To not let origins get overshadowed by the growing story.

The origin is still evident, but we have to look harder now. So it is a challenge, but I like a challenge. That was at a time when I was thinking about whether or not I was going to try 000. I didn’t realize it that night, but that was probably the moment that made it clear to me that I wanted to try something different with Porsche media, and I wanted to find a new way to support the arts.

That night, there was what you would call the “old guard” of Porsche enthusiasts and also people I have never seen before. Turns out, they are not even Porsche enthusiasts. They are creatives and they are interested in design, so they are naturally interested in Porsche. Why is this person interested in a factory race car driver? What is the connection? That excites me.BH: Do you have any mentors?

I view mentors as something different from parents. I’ve got great parents, but I have many mentors—far too many to name here.

That’s the number one thing I can encourage anyone towards, whether they are young or old. It is never too late to seek mentors. Mentors are key. If we hunger to see things that are further down the road, why would we only hang out with our peers or versions of ourselves?On the professional side, I think about Letitia Robinson, Bob Carlson, Bruce and Stephanie Anderson, David Murry, Hurley Haywood, Jeff Zwart, and Randy Leffingwell.

On the personal side, one of the biggest was Danny Clark, a forklift driver at Costco who changed the course of my life by speaking truth into my life when I was just 17. In college, Louis Baker, Brad Elliot, Marilyn McIntyre. My mechanic Steve De Jung is really a mentor who just happens to be my mechanic. Ernie King has had a huge influence in my life. The first article I wrote that was published in a magazine was on his hot-rod 914-6, and we still have lunch regularly.

We go deep, and sometimes we even get back to cars!Byron Meyer, a patron of the arts in San Francisco, opened my eyes to design, to contemporary art and architecture. My business partner, Alex Palevsky, is another friend in my life with a highly developed sense of art. Derryck Dias is a sage, as is Ralph Jackson. This is already feeling like a laundry list, and I know I am leaving critical figures out—I can only hope they’ll forgive me.But the one mentor I’m luckiest to have is my wife, Rebekah.

She’s seven years younger, but I get to look up to her every day. I really enjoyed this interview! Thanks, Bracken and thanks, Pete.

I am fairly new to Porsche ownership, and it happened later in my life because I remembered the joy of driving some of my friend’s funky little 914’s in the ’70’s. When it came time to take the plunge, I did consider getting a well-sorted 914 2.0, but decided against beginning with a 40+ year old car. Instead, I went with a 12 year old 986 Boxster. What a pure and great driving experience! It’s just me, three pedals, 225hp, and magical handling and sound. The so-called “hair-dresser’s car” (although Read more ».

Many thanks, Guitar Slinger! With regard to your two concerns: 1) 3-7% ads may as well be no ads against the traditional model of 55-65% advertising content. Ads were not and are not a compelling part of the business model, but I wondered if a magazine with NO ads would feel like a magazine or a book, and whether some interesting brands might like to have a presence in 000. So we have severely limited advertising, which is carefully curated and meant to be another element of discovery in 000. So far, we’ve held it at 3% to keep the Read more ».

Malcolm Nance Impeachment Day Interview On The Stephanie Miller ShowIt’s Donald Trump’s Impeachment Day in the House of Representatives. What better way to mark the day and illuminate the Trump-Russia conspiracy than this. A Malcolm Nance interview on the Stephanie Miller Show. Malcolm predicted the tagging of Trump as a Russian agent. Also he foresaw the Tulsi mis-vote and her potential decision to run a third party campaign. We need to get indivisible and reject agents of division during this nation’s most crucial election year.

Vote- the stakes have never been higher. Malcolm Nance is the greatest author and intelligence expert in the anti-Trump resistance movement.

He told you so before and during the Trump election campaign. Now he is back with more confirmation and information about the most criminal White House occupants ever to seize power. Also their domestic terrorists. Another must-read from Nance.Stephanie Miller:Happy Impeachment Day, Malcolm.Okay, so you know what, we keep talking about this, Malcolm.

This is right in your bailiwick, as they say. What he’s freaking out about is this #DmitriFirst story, probably.

Is that there’s money that obviously is funding Giuliani in this Russian disinformation campaign about Ukraine, is coming directly from Russia through Lev Parnas. Malcolm Nance:Yeah. You’re absolutely right. Firtash Ukrainian oligarch is just tied deeply and closely to Manefort. Who, by the way, had a cardiac arrest yesterday. Cardiac incident while in jail.

If I was Manefort I would be pretty miffed that Rick Gates got 45 days. Stephanie Miller isOne way to fight back is and read it and give it to everybody you know Stephanie Miller:Well he’s still cooperating though, right?

Malcolm Nance:Yeah he’s still cooperating but then again so might Lev Parnas. I mean this may be what the Parnas’ lawyers were dropping hints about. That yeah, they got a million dollars from Firtash but how do we know that that was not part of this whole deal and that the prosecutors and the FBI know all about it. Man this may be the string that they’re pulling to lead them in a roundabout way from Russia funding this entire operation using oligarchs and using Rudy Giuliani. It can only get deep from here. Stephanie Miller:By the way, just so people know if you aren’t paying attention. Firtash is also said to be directly implicated in Giuliani’s efforts to obtain dirt on the Biden family.

In November he told the New York Times that Giuliani, Parnas, and Fruman promised to utilize connections at the DOJ to help him. While he helped them pursue and obtained well, fake evidence, regarding the Biden thing. I mean, this whole thing is so dirty. Great that you know Rudy’s trying to get the DOJ to help them if they help him. I mean, it’s sixteen layers of dirty.

Malcolm Nance:Sure Firtash is wanted. So what you have is, you have this Russian oligarch carrying out an operation where he thinks he’s paying off and funding this secret operation.

That, to be quite honest, I would not be surprised if in the end when Giuliani is arrested that it turns out that this was how Giuliani was making money.That Lev Parnas with getting money. That Giuliani was getting paid by this and from this oligarch in order to raise these these arrest warrants that were out for him. Not to mention, doing all of the bidding of the Kremlin. Because as you can see, the Kremlin is behind all of this. I think it’s just damages Solinskey. It damages our relationships. It gets us to stop giving them weapons.

It gets Trump off, gets Russia off the hook for the 2016 election. I mean this thing is labyrinthine. Only because it’s money, and like all things money, that flows like water and everybody wants some.Stephanie Miller:I mentioned this yesterday but saved the details for you.In the wake of Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov’s visit to the Oval Office last week, Russian state TV aired a segment entitled Puppet Master, An Agent. How to understand Lavrov’s meeting with Trump and characterize the visit as an example of Trump being subservient to Russian interests. President Vladimir Putin’s propaganda brigades, they said, enjoy watching the heightened divisions in the United States and how it hurts relations between the US and Ukraine.

Writes The Daily Beast and the host quipped that Trump would have to seek refuge in Russia once he’s out of office. You said America endorses this option. Yeah this is extraordinary. Malcolm Nance:What’s extraordinary about it is how many times have we all been called conspiracy theorists but you’re putting out not even the crazy parts, but just putting out the basic information on the Trump-Russia scandal.

I mean we have all these people I call Trump Russia truthers, okay. Who are people who say that this never happened, from the left and from the crazy far right, and now here we have Russian television bragging about it. Bragging about Trump as their agent. Stephanie Miller:Let me just report, yeah let me read this from Daily Beast. Giuliani’s efforts on behalf of Trump are bound to pay propaganda dividends for the Kremlin.

Putin has expressed undisguised delight with the crusade led by Trump and Giuliani to whitewash Moscow’s interference in US elections and plan to pin the blame on Kiev. The emerging narrative from Russian propaganda outlets puts the hypocrisy of Republicans on full display. The Kremlin having argued for years that democracy is a sham and the West is devoid of morals and principles, can now showcase the GOP as Exhibit A. I mean, how long have you been talking about this? It is that they have co-opted an entire party. Not just Trump.

Malcolm Nance is the greatest author and intelligence expert in the anti-Trump resistance movement. He told you so before and during the Trump election campaign. Now he is back with more confirmation and information about the most criminal White House occupants ever to seize power. Also their domestic terrorists. Another must-read from Nance.Malcolm Nance:Three books worth and that’s why this, in my latest book Plot to Betray America is exactly that. There’s an entire chapter in there called American Fifth Columnist.

This is where the Republican Party has decided that they will go along with any crazy Russian intelligence induced operation and rumor in order to protect Donald Trump. America be damned.

So, that’s why I put my warning out the other day. I don’t know if you’ve read that but we’re in trouble. We’re in serious serious national security jeopardy here. Because while everyone’s talking about impeachment, there is a bigger operation at play here. And that is Russian intelligence and Vladimir Putin have figured out that Rudy Giuliani is the conduit for how they are going to destroy the Democrats.American democracy by going forward, by having professionals who will create documents. Let me tell you something.

When you give an agency a few billion dollars they can print up foreign money by using the exact same machines. So Giuliani starts whipping out documents on Berisma and whipping out, like, documents signed by Joe Biden which have never been seen in this world. Believe me, their intent is to make sure that Trump wins this election and they will at this point, as we see do anything, and Giuliani is willing to do anything to make sure that the Russians, and Trump, and pro-Moscow Ukrainians win this battle and destroy American democracy. Stephanie Miller:So how do we fight that I guess would be the question. Now that you’ve terrified the bejesus out of me. Malcolm Nance:We can fight it the way that I always say it and that’s sunlight.

With regards to the very fact that I’m saying this out loud in advance. It’s one of those things like where we we tell terrorists we know what their operations are what they’re going to hit.

Because that means they have to recalculate and reroute. Now the impeachment is giving Trump all of this grief to the point where the Russian meta-narrative of the Ukraine was the one who hacked the 2016 election comes off as crazy for 60% of America. Only Trump’s supporters buy into all of that stuff. The only way really to hurt them is to do what I do with alarming regularity on the Internet. I asked them why they’re all commie lovers. Stephanie Miller:You know we just had a caller that said I’m gonna be an impeachable deplorable by the end of the day, and I’ll wear it as a badge of honor, just like Trump will.

Ukraine if you’re listening send those emails. Malcolm Nance is the greatest author and intelligence expert in the anti-Trump resistance movement.

He told you so before and during the Trump election campaign. Now he is back with more confirmation and information about the most criminal White House occupants ever to seize power. Also their domestic terrorists.

Another must-read from Nance.Malcolm Nance:Yeah, well we’ve got to do a counter ideological, mortal combat on this issue and the funny thing is. Again, we have been hammered. I know you know my buddy there Andrew Sullivan and the Glenn Greenwald’s, and the Matt Taibbis, and the Isaac Chotners at New York Mag all came out and were saying. Well how does he? This is crazy. You know, you’re saying Trump is an agent. Now the Russians are saying Trump is an agent!

Stephanie Miller:Thank you. Well, Eric Swalwell just tweeted that he got bashed for saying Trump’s a Russian agent and then he he retweeted the headline Russian television says Trump is an agent of Russia. By the way, so you also said in terms of the party. You said Trump calls the GOP the United Republican Party. Maybe because Putin leads the United Russia Party. He just cannot quit that man. Malcolm Nance:That’s weird that Trump called it the United Republican Party and I don’t know whether he was just doing it as a rhetorical flourish to show that the Never Trumpers aren’t part of that but if he starts using that phrase, right?

Well that is the name of Vladimir Putin’s party, the United Russia Party. All this stuff is no longer coincidence right? Nance’s law has been long thrown out the window. It is obviously part of a pattern of information where people within the Trump camp within his only Oval Office see themselves as a subordinate entity to Russia.

Look, the government of Austria did that. As soon as they won.This was a party that was formed, by the way, by two Waffen-SS Nazi officers in 1952. When they won power in 2016 the first thing they did was sign a joint unity contract between their Alternative for Austria Party and the United Russia Party tying them together for economic social cultural and political contacts. Is this being done by Donald Trump in those phone calls we don’t know about? Are the Republicans now completely subordinate to Russia? We just discussed this on the talk an upcoming edition of the Talking Feds podcast.

Where Franklin Guzzi said, are we having a counterintelligence Pearl Harbor? Where we don’t realize it, but that the United States may in fact have had an entire party infiltrated and co-opted by a foreign government. Stephanie Miller:By the way Bob Seska brought this up. Did you watch the Lisa Paige interview on Maddow last night?

Because he was saying what was disturbing is what happened to the counter intelligence investigation? Because she says, like, Yes, Muller was doing the the criminal one. Malcolm Nance:Interestingly enough, Lisa Paige, Peter Struck, Andrew McCabe, all of these guys were the FBI’s and Justice’s top counterintelligence people. Peter Struck was the top Russian mafia hunter at the FBI. So was Andrew McCabe, who cut his teeth hunting the Russian mafia in the Rockaways in New York City. So something I realized. These people needed to be taken out.

Malcolm Nance is the greatest author and intelligence expert in the anti-Trump resistance movement. He told you so before and during the Trump election campaign.

Now he is back with more confirmation and information about the most criminal White House occupants ever to seize power. Also their domestic terrorists. Another must-read from Nance.Stephanie Miller:But that’s what I’m saying. Did that, was her answer, I couldn’t tell. Was her answer that someone made it go away, the counterintelligence investigation?

Malcolm Nance:Well, we don’t know. According to the Muller report there was a counterintelligence component to it, but whether there is still extant a operation where the FBI is going after all the Russian intelligence people that are in the country. That may have been related to this.I think, you know, that one of my fellow bloggers are on Twitter who did research for me and she helped with Youngers Craig Youngers’ book, House of Putin – House of Trump, on the ties to the Russian Mafia are outrageous. I mean, they are the subcontractor for Russian intelligence. So you don’t need to see spies when you have billionaire Russian mafia oligarchs who are doing this work for the Kremlin and every once in a while an ex-spy pops up, but most of them are money fixers who have had deep relationships with Trump. This is where we need to be watching. Stephanie Miller:Malcolm before we go.

Again you are so right about this is their narrative; United Republican Party Democrats in disarray. You keep warning us at Exhibit A. You said Tulsi Gabbard will be the one Democrat to vote to allow Trump’s bribery and extortion in Putin’s attack to continue. She should just switch parties now.

Her own words indicate she will betray that oath. She will betray us all.

Word is, of course she’s already trying to push for censure not impeachment. Malcolm Nance:Look I’ll tell you right now. If that guy from, wheres it, Minnesota or Wisconsin? Peterson decides he’s gonna you know vote present or something like that, Tulsi Gabbard will be the one to vote no against the Articles of Impeachment, both of them. I mean she’s- Who knows what party she belongs in. She should just get out now. She just go follow the role of Van Drew and just become a Republican or declare yourself the Independent that she’s been pretending she’s going to be, and she’s going to run as third party.

She is the Jill Stein of this election. Stephanie Miller:She’s the Jill Stein of Susan Sarandons! I was just gonna say, though, real quick. Van Drew, that should be a cautionary tale. Nobody wants him.

The Republicans just called him a weasel and are going to run against him too. Nobody likes weasel. Finally, you said vote for who you love in the primary but this awesome Joe Biden Biden video is right. We do we need to stop Trump at all costs. Malcolm Nance:Good God. If you haven’t watched the Joe Biden video that came out yesterday. OK, first off you’re gonna get a little guy cry at the end of it.

Because, I don’t care who the nominee is, that’s the stakes. The stakes are the Constitution of the United States. Thomas Jefferson who, this is interesting because, Biden put out this thing about Jefferson being sort of a hypocrite. He was a slave owner who was actually having children with his slaves, but knew that we would always advance toward becoming a more perfect union. Over time our legacy would be that we would become a great nation, and he says this is all at risk. It is all at risk, this is it. This is the election of your life time.

For me it is. Malcolm Nance is the greatest author and intelligence expert in the anti-Trump resistance movement. He told you so before and during the Trump election campaign. Now he is back with more confirmation and information about the most criminal White House occupants ever to seize power. Also their domestic terrorists. Another must-read from Nance.Stephanie Miller:Malcolm, real quick before you go.

Val in Maine wants to know about what that Russian ship is doing off the East Coast. You heard about that? Malcolm Nance:Yeah the crate ship. It’s out there tapping cables. What they’re doing I mean you know one of these days, all right. You know I wrote this in my book. That Benedict Arnold, I gave him such a bad rap in my video.

I was talking about him with Donald Trump. Well I owe him an apology because Trump’s not gonna be like Benedict Arnold.

He’s gonna be like another Major General who was in the US Army at the time, who we found out in 1859 was a traitor. You know it’s gonna take time. We’re eventually going to find the documents, but I want to see whether that Russian ship correlates to major activities and communications coming out of Washington DC. Nah, I find that hard to believe. Hey, one last thing about Van Drew the guy wears plaid shirts and a plaid jacket. Stephanie Miller:Yeah, that’s impeachable All right.

Treasons Greetings.Now you can read about the original foresight in Malcolm’s. Posts That Motiv8 You.

April 29, 2020This is page is for those extreme cases where your physical shape or lack of strength prevents you from advancing. These are serious supplements and not to be taken lightly or not as directed. You.

April 13, 2020Part 2. Early Corona Virus update: This is a story about not just a coast to coast cruise, but also travel.

Interstate travel during the beginning of the corona virus (or COVID-19) outbreak in the. April 17, 2020This is a story about not just a coast to coast cruise, but also travel. Interstate travel during the beginning of the corona virus (or COVID-19) outbreak in the USA.Cruise Cam Coast to Coast 2020. February 17, 2020Donald Trump in some way shape or form, for some reason is in debt to Vladimir Putin. I don’t know what it is. Maybe he still thinks he’s getting Trump Tower 2.0 out of it. March 9, 2020now we know what the strategy is.

Now we know what the scam is, and what I’m trying to do with this book is expose it. Particularly in red States where this where this goes. May 1, 2020Watch Internet TV On Your Phone Or Any Smart Device.Use this popular internet TV and movie streaming service. View your favorite channels live and on demand. Watch thousands of movies online, current movies, classic cinema. January 23, 2020Malcolm Nance has them and more in his analysis from the intelligence community viewpoint. Trump-Putin collusion creates the most dangerous time in our nation’s history.

January 24, 2020The presentation ends with an inspiring call to action. If enough Americans guard their information intake they can make cyber warfare resistible.

If we simply show up to vote, we can transform our nation. Participation. January 20, 2020Read the presentation at Club Helsinki on the occasion of the release of Malcolm Nance’s new book Plot to Betray America.

The last in the trilogy of books that fueled the anti-Trump resistance movement. Malcolm. January 17, 2020We’re at the most dangerous point in American history. I’m a historian. I say that without any compunction at all. Because my job in the intelligence community was not to come and give you the.

January 23, 2020This Iowa debate left people criticizing the reckless way CNN handled it. If I wanted to hear enemy talking points and read them on the labels I’d watch Fox. This was something more sinister than. January 23, 2020Mark today for the physical transmission of Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, witness list and evidence. It will be manually carried to the Senate by House Managers, including Adam Schiff.

The people have been.Amazon Music and video Store.